Brexit and Beer | Jacob Rees-Mogg


This is an example transcript with key editing/copying tools.

  • Click the eye/folder button to switch between VIEW and EDIT MODE.
  • Click the text in VIEW MODE to be taken directly to that point in the video.
  • Click the text in EDIT MODE button to make changes. 
  • Click COPY to copy the transcript (with any changes) for pasting elsewhere.

ANAND: Good evening, everyone; welcome to this latest in our Beer and Brexit series. It's a (UNCLEAR) Jacob Rees-Mogg, who's just come hot-footing it from the House of Commons where the vote’s taken place of which more anon. Jacob, I'm sorry it's not quite champagne with Boris & Co. you enjoyed last night, but I hope you enjoy yourself anyway. Jacob is of course the Conservative MP for Northeast Somerset - having failed to become the MP for Central Fife in 1997 - I wanted to ask you if you were secretly quite pleased to have lost that one, but I won’t. He was elected in 2010, so has had a front-row seat for all the political fun and games since then; and as you all know, he sits on the exiting the European (UNCLEAR) I believe you're a fan of cricket, and a Somerset fan

JACOB: I am indeed; yes, that's absolutely right.  

ANAND: So did you go watch Somerset when they had Viv Richards?  

JACOB: I did indeed; the very first match I watched at Taunton was the John Player leagues, a Sunday match. Limited overs, 40 overs, Somerset versus Kent; and when I tell you that the highest scorer for Somerset was Joel Garner, you will realise that Somerset lost.

ANAND: Well, I've reached that age where I sort of looked back with fond memories of the days when sporting events were sponsored by fag companies; as it used to be. So I want to start with what happened yesterday, because obviously it was very important; and I suppose the first thing to ask you is, were you taken aback by the size of the defeat?  

JACOB: Yes, I was. With these things you have your numbers - and you know who you've spoken to and your team's spoken to, who is likely to be on your side - but you always expect a good deal of slippage, because there is a mystique about the Whip's office; you think they will be able to get people back. So had we believed our own numbers, it was the sort of region we were getting to; but of course, we didn't we didn't think that was likely to be so such a solid turnout of Eurosceptic as there was. So I was surprised; I thought it would be significant (UNCLEAR)

ANAND: Isn't that just a bit of a chronic inability to count in Parliament? Going back to the vote of no-confidence in December - all these numbers are bandied around, and they all proved to be wrong - (UNCLEAR) whether this is my memory going, but I seem to recall a time when the Whips knew what they were doing and you (UNCLEAR) Something changed.

JACOB: Yes; something very important has changed, and that is the Fixed Term Parliament Act. Fixed Term Parliament Act makes it much easier to vote against the government on any routine vote - not like the vote this evening; the vote this evening was a vote of no conference under the terms of the Fixed Term Parliament Act. Had the government lost, it's highly likely there would have been a general election - but all other votes are not any longer votes that could create a general election. If we were operating prior to 2011 the government, may well have made yesterday the confidence vote; which would have faced people like me with a real dilemma. Do we vote for a deal that we think is terrible, or do we vote to bring the government down, lose the Whip and leave Parliament? It's quite a serious dilemma which has been taken away; and that, I think. has affected the ability to count, because people are much freer than they were prior to 2011.

 

Completed work is marked by the “END OF TRANSCRIPT” sign at the bottom of every page.

 

--- END OF TRANSCRIPT ---

 
 

-VIEW MODE-


00:00:00